Skip to main content

The Bathtub and Infinity

While in the bathtub tonight I finally understood what Stanley Jaki meant when he said (more than once) that the universe can not be infinite, for an infinite quantity can never be realized.

That never really sank in until I saw it ... right there in the tub as the water was sinking down the drain.  It is the nature of infinity that it has no limit.  Its very definition means it is indefinite - in-de-finite; it can not be real, composed of things.  It can only be conceptual.  There is no such thing as "an infinite number of things" for infinity is, in one sense, not a "number" (you can never count "up to" infinity), and "things" are always "realized".  By its nature infinity can not be "realized", composed of actual things.

Jaki saw this and saw that this was the fundamental philosophical and mathematic reason that the universe was finite; there were empirical reasons as well.  And if the universe is finite, then materialistic atheists who deify Chance have a big big problem.

Anyway, if you don't get it, maybe some day you will.  It took me several years and a nice hot bath.

Stanley Jaki, OSB (1924-2009)

Comments

Tom Leith said…
I'd read something about this once. The question is "Since the universe is (evidently) expanding, what's it expanding into? What exactly is meant by 'universe'?" One answer is that it expands into [undefined] -- until the universe expands into [undefined] it is no-thing. At least no-thing we can say or know anything about. Since the distances within the universe are finite, we can say the universe is not infinite. But it can (apparently) expand infinitely. Here Frequently Asked Questions in Cosmology.
Kevin O'Brien said…
I don't know enough about the current thinking on the expanding universe to comment, Tom - but Jaki used to ask, "Is there a universe?" Here's his proof for it, and it includes the conclusion that the universe is finite. From a commenter on another blog ...

Here is Fr. Jaki’s proof on the reality of the “universe,” I can' remember if it is from A Mind's Matter or one of his other works:

Premise 1: There exists material entities.

Premise 2: All material entities contain quantitatively determinable, measurable properties, in the sense that they can be counted.

Premise 3: Therefore, those entities constitute a coherent system insofar as its parts reveal some basic quantitative properties whereby they can be counted.

Conclusion: And if they can be counted, the universe has to be finite and so the universe must be the strict totality of interacting things.
Tom Leith said…
And there's another answer -- the space between the interacting things isn't part of the universe. OK. So maybe the Infinite Improbability Drive will work after all, but not for the reasons we thought. Of course, as much as I like sushi, I really don't want to be turned into a penguin mainly because it would interfere with more important things like getting drunk and dancing with girls. So I should avoid space travel. Probably.

Popular posts from this blog

Escape from Utopia

“Karen, I was right!  Someone escaped!  She says they are a cult!” I said to my wife, exuberant. It was Monday, Labor Day.  We were at the Lake of the Ozarks, in mid-Missouri, and Karen, my wife, noticed a group of people standing near the overlook on the hill above the lake’s dam.  A man about my age was about to take a picture of a group of teenagers with the lake in the background.  All of them were well groomed, well behaved and wearing polo shirts and caps that said “Shepherdsfield” on them.  Karen offered to take the picture for this man, so he could be in it as well.  He was very grateful. “What’s Shepherdsfield?” I asked after the photo had clicked. “We’re a Christian community near Fulton, Missouri,” the man answered.  “We’re on our Reward Trip.  These young people have been working very hard all summer, and we’re taking them on a Reward Trip before school starts again.”  My eyes locked with one of the young people....

Charlie Johnston's Followers take the Next Wrong Step

NOTE - On April 29, 2106, Charlie Johnston responded to this post and my previous one with outright lies, doing his best to libel me in the process. I go into detail about that here - Charlie Johnston Lies about Me - and I Admire Him for It! Charlie is one of the most outrageous frauds in the Catholic Church. He actually fascinates me - in a sad way. Read on ... Charlie Johnston is a false prophet. His archbishop has "strongly" advised Catholics to be cautious of him.  His archbishop has also banned him from speaking in his own archdiocese. Charlie, in the great tradition of false prophets, has spun this warning to his own advantage , and Charlie's True Believers have rallied around him and have been guzzling the Kool-Aid since the bishop's letter and Charlie's spin appeared earlier this week. I posted about Charlie Johnston last fall , detailing at least one of his prophecies that have proven false, and detailing, from evidence on his Faceb...

A Note on my Religious Work

For those of you who know me from EWTN, the Society of GK Chesterton, the Prairie Troubadours or The St. Austin Review, I am no longer affiliated with any of those groups. "The truth will set you free" ( John 8:32 ) "To this end was I born, and for this cause came I into the world, that I should bear witness unto the truth. Every one that is of the truth heareth my voice." ( John 18:37 ) If we deny the truth, we are bad Christians and bad human beings. If we put our faith in a lie - including a Big Lie - we are bad Christians and bad human beings. If we endorse vulgarity, violence, bullying, gaslighting, fraud, irrational conspiracy theories, sedition and hate, we are bad Christians and bad human beings. Since March of 2020, I have felt like a character in the play Rhinoceros by Eugene Ionesco.  In that play, the bestial inhumanity of rhinoceroses becomes a fad and people start turning into them - willingly discarding reason and free will and mocking others who don...