Skip to main content

My Hesitation

Re. Fr. Jiang and Archbishop Carlson, I just wrote to a friend about the difficulty of blogging about this ...

I keep trying to address the fact that we don't really know all the facts here - but even when we did (as in the Bishop Finn case), the Super-Catholics still rallied around their guy and vilified the victims.

So, yes, I'm skeptical and I'm cynical.  The story told by the alleged victim in Old Monroe fits a pattern; it rings true.  It may be false.  But apparently there's enough evidence to substantiate it, and if it is indeed true, it means we're dealing with a level of depravity in our archdiocese that no one is going to want to face head on.  It means that clergy and laity alike will lie thorough their teeth or at least bend the truth in order to keep up appearances and reputation.  It means that children and families will be sacrificed for the sake of status and power.

If the allegations are false, then we're dealing with a similar level of depravity on the other side.

Either way, I pray that we all have the courage to confront the truth when it finally comes out.  If it finally comes out.

But I fear that if this girl has indeed been victimized, and if Archbishop Carlson has indeed enabled the crime and attempted to cover it up, my fellow theologically orthodox Catholics will look the other way, call Bill Donohue for a spin job, and crucify me and any other Catholic who reports on this in the process.

The decade-old scandal is darker and deeper than we care to admit, and until we confront it and the hell that it inhabits and celebrates, it won't go away.


Comments

Anonymous said…
Why write about it then? Why focus on something you know nothing about?
Kevin O'Brien said…
Because I don't know "nothing" about it. Read my posts on this - http://thwordinc.blogspot.com/search/label/CARLSON .

We all actually know quite a bit, but the Super-Catholics and Clericalists want desperately to be the "Know Nothings" when it comes to the Scandal in general land this one in particular.

Here's what we know.

We know that the evidence substantiates the claims - at least enough for the prosecution to go forward and for the priest to be removed from his duties. We know that a certain group of Catholics don't give a damn about the veracity of the claims or the victim and her family, and are more than willing to call the crimes detailed by a likely victim of sexual abuse "a teen-aged girl's fantasy". We know that the Abuse Scandal indicates a corruption that is vast and debilitating to the Catholic Church, systemic in its scope and reach.

But we don't want to know. We don't want to see it. We want the pretending to continue.

The Church is in a crisis and only two things will save us, by the grace of God. "Know Nothing-ness" isn't one of them.

I go into that here ... http://thwordinc.blogspot.com/2013/07/the-crisis-inside-church.html

Popular posts from this blog

The Full Story on Bishop Finn

" Let's step outside and settle this thing like men ," she said, and she was a lady. " You're spewing anti-Catholic rhetoric !" he insisted. "How can you criticize a bishop when you're an actor and everyone knows actors are perverts and nitwits ," she screamed. (That last gal had a point). These are all reactions to my post last week about Rod Dreher's article on Bishop Finn's Indictment. And above all, people are charging me with believing the biased media coverage of the scandal. This, at least, is not true. In fact, everything I say in this post will be taken not from a media account of the scandal , but from the independent report on it as commissioned by the diocese , the Graves Report, which you can read on your own here . So let's shove the media aside and see for ourselves what's contained in this internal diocesan report conducted by an independent firm. *** Fr. Shawn Ratigan was a priest of the diocese of Kansas Cit...

What Follows ...

At one point I took all of these posts down, because I felt I had been far too willingly brainwashed into a religious system that was doing more harm than good.   But, lately, I decided to republish some of the more interesting posts.  What follows is about ten percent of what I posted from 2007 to 2021.  They are in an odd chronological order, becuase Blogger is a clunky. Meanwhile, you can find my more sane (and more recent) musings here -  https://theateroftheword.substack.com .

Alarms and Violent Decisions

On Monday I returned from nearly two weeks on the road, our Great North Tour, in which we gave 15 performances of 7 scripts in 13 days in 6 states – from Grand Forks, North Dakota, to Holt’s Summit, Missouri. In all of that wonderful chaos God gave me the great blessing of being away from the internet . And two weeks away from the Lying for Jesus issue was very therapeutic. But as therapy ends and Lent begins, I’d like to conclude my thoughts on the firestorm that swept us all up into the single most divisive issue I have encountered in ten years as a Catholic. My Role in This Back in August, James O’Keefe was invited to give what amounted to the keynote address at the American Chesterton Society Conference in Emmitsburg, Maryland. O’Keefe electrified the crowd by telling us that he was inspired by G. K. Chesterton (he did not mention his other role model, quasi-Satanist Saul Alinsky) and that he, James O’Keefe, was willing to live a monk –like existence harassed by leftists and...