Skip to main content

The Tortuous Route of Advocating for Torture

By


Here's the big game advocates of torture play:

If torture is wrong, you mean I can't spank my son when he misbehaves?  If torture is wrong, you mean nuns should not have been rapping the knuckles of their students with rulers?  If torture is wrong, then why can't we even define what it consists of?  Goodness gracious, drowning or producing a fear of drowning in a Muslim.  How could that be torture???

Cowardly as this line of reasoning is, it at least points toward a truth.  The Church says that torture is intrinsically evil, evil by its very nature.  If torture is merely severe corporal punishment (and nothing else), then how can that be?  Does the nature of something change when its degree changes?  Corporal punishment is not intrinsically evil, so why should severe corporal punishment be?  Severe corporal punishment may be wrong (as too much eating or too much drinking is wrong), but the thing in and of itself is not wrong, no more wrong than eating or drinking are, when not indulged in to an extreme: in other words not intrinsically wrong.

My response would be: an act is intrinsically evil not because it differs from other acts in degree, but in kind.

Thus, torture is not merely severe corporal punishment.  Indeed, psychological torture may make no use of corporal punishment at all.  So, then, what is torture and what distinguishes it from other acts that may become wrong if indulged in to disproportionate degree, but that are not wrong by their nature?

As I wrote on Facebook ...

TORTURE is the attempt to destroy the Image of God in another human being, to take control of his will and reason.  It is typically done with psychological or physical coercion, or a combination of both.  It is not intense corporal punishment, which can be aimed at reform of the will, but which never seeks to destroy the will.  [Torture may make use of corporal punishment, but corporal punishment alone does not define what torture is.] For torture is aimed at taking away the very substance of man's being, while leaving him a tool for another's disposal and control.  

(Hat tip to Paul Rhodes, by the way, who first put this idea into words, in my back yard, at a meeting of the ChesterBelloc Drinking and Debating Club.)

In brief, TORTURE is simply the worst thing one human being can do to another and should not be condoned by godless atheists, much less Catholics.


Labels:

Comments

Anonymous said…
I love how when pressed on the matter, the torture cheerleaders will then turn around and state that waterboarding is not torture.

Dr. Eric
May 5, 2014 at 3:36 PM
Kevin O'Brien said…
It's the same technique the Liars used. "Lying is not condemned by Church teaching! Oh, it is? The act in question is not lying! Oh, it is? Lying is not condemned by Church teaching! Oh, it is? The act in question is not lying! Oh, it is? Lying is not condemned by Church teaching ... " Lather, rinse, repeat.
May 5, 2014 at 9:02 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Full Story on Bishop Finn

By
" Let's step outside and settle this thing like men ," she said, and she was a lady. " You're spewing anti-Catholic rhetoric !" he insisted. "How can you criticize a bishop when you're an actor and everyone knows actors are perverts and nitwits ," she screamed. (That last gal had a point). These are all reactions to my post last week about Rod Dreher's article on Bishop Finn's Indictment. And above all, people are charging me with believing the biased media coverage of the scandal. This, at least, is not true. In fact, everything I say in this post will be taken not from a media account of the scandal , but from the independent report on it as commissioned by the diocese , the Graves Report, which you can read on your own here . So let's shove the media aside and see for ourselves what's contained in this internal diocesan report conducted by an independent firm. *** Fr. Shawn Ratigan was a priest of the diocese of Kansas Cit...
99 comments
Read more

Escape from Utopia

By
“Karen, I was right!  Someone escaped!  She says they are a cult!” I said to my wife, exuberant. It was Monday, Labor Day.  We were at the Lake of the Ozarks, in mid-Missouri, and Karen, my wife, noticed a group of people standing near the overlook on the hill above the lake’s dam.  A man about my age was about to take a picture of a group of teenagers with the lake in the background.  All of them were well groomed, well behaved and wearing polo shirts and caps that said “Shepherdsfield” on them.  Karen offered to take the picture for this man, so he could be in it as well.  He was very grateful. “What’s Shepherdsfield?” I asked after the photo had clicked. “We’re a Christian community near Fulton, Missouri,” the man answered.  “We’re on our Reward Trip.  These young people have been working very hard all summer, and we’re taking them on a Reward Trip before school starts again.”  My eyes locked with one of the young people....
Post a Comment
Read more

What Follows ...

By
At one point I took all of these posts down, because I felt I had been far too willingly brainwashed into a religious system that was doing more harm than good.   But, lately, I decided to republish some of the more interesting posts.  What follows is about ten percent of what I posted from 2007 to 2021.  They are in an odd chronological order, becuase Blogger is a clunky. Meanwhile, you can find my more sane (and more recent) musings here -  https://theateroftheword.substack.com .
Post a Comment
Read more