Skip to main content

The Tortuous Route of Advocating for Torture

By


Here's the big game advocates of torture play:

If torture is wrong, you mean I can't spank my son when he misbehaves?  If torture is wrong, you mean nuns should not have been rapping the knuckles of their students with rulers?  If torture is wrong, then why can't we even define what it consists of?  Goodness gracious, drowning or producing a fear of drowning in a Muslim.  How could that be torture???

Cowardly as this line of reasoning is, it at least points toward a truth.  The Church says that torture is intrinsically evil, evil by its very nature.  If torture is merely severe corporal punishment (and nothing else), then how can that be?  Does the nature of something change when its degree changes?  Corporal punishment is not intrinsically evil, so why should severe corporal punishment be?  Severe corporal punishment may be wrong (as too much eating or too much drinking is wrong), but the thing in and of itself is not wrong, no more wrong than eating or drinking are, when not indulged in to an extreme: in other words not intrinsically wrong.

My response would be: an act is intrinsically evil not because it differs from other acts in degree, but in kind.

Thus, torture is not merely severe corporal punishment.  Indeed, psychological torture may make no use of corporal punishment at all.  So, then, what is torture and what distinguishes it from other acts that may become wrong if indulged in to disproportionate degree, but that are not wrong by their nature?

As I wrote on Facebook ...

TORTURE is the attempt to destroy the Image of God in another human being, to take control of his will and reason.  It is typically done with psychological or physical coercion, or a combination of both.  It is not intense corporal punishment, which can be aimed at reform of the will, but which never seeks to destroy the will.  [Torture may make use of corporal punishment, but corporal punishment alone does not define what torture is.] For torture is aimed at taking away the very substance of man's being, while leaving him a tool for another's disposal and control.  

(Hat tip to Paul Rhodes, by the way, who first put this idea into words, in my back yard, at a meeting of the ChesterBelloc Drinking and Debating Club.)

In brief, TORTURE is simply the worst thing one human being can do to another and should not be condoned by godless atheists, much less Catholics.


Labels

Labels:

Comments

Anonymous said…
I love how when pressed on the matter, the torture cheerleaders will then turn around and state that waterboarding is not torture.

Dr. Eric
May 5, 2014 at 3:36 PM
Kevin O'Brien said…
It's the same technique the Liars used. "Lying is not condemned by Church teaching! Oh, it is? The act in question is not lying! Oh, it is? Lying is not condemned by Church teaching! Oh, it is? The act in question is not lying! Oh, it is? Lying is not condemned by Church teaching ... " Lather, rinse, repeat.
May 5, 2014 at 9:02 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Escape from Utopia

By
“Karen, I was right!  Someone escaped!  She says they are a cult!” I said to my wife, exuberant. It was Monday, Labor Day.  We were at the Lake of the Ozarks, in mid-Missouri, and Karen, my wife, noticed a group of people standing near the overlook on the hill above the lake’s dam.  A man about my age was about to take a picture of a group of teenagers with the lake in the background.  All of them were well groomed, well behaved and wearing polo shirts and caps that said “Shepherdsfield” on them.  Karen offered to take the picture for this man, so he could be in it as well.  He was very grateful. “What’s Shepherdsfield?” I asked after the photo had clicked. “We’re a Christian community near Fulton, Missouri,” the man answered.  “We’re on our Reward Trip.  These young people have been working very hard all summer, and we’re taking them on a Reward Trip before school starts again.”  My eyes locked with one of the young people....
Post a Comment
Read more

Charlie Johnston's Followers take the Next Wrong Step

By
NOTE - On April 29, 2106, Charlie Johnston responded to this post and my previous one with outright lies, doing his best to libel me in the process. I go into detail about that here - Charlie Johnston Lies about Me - and I Admire Him for It! Charlie is one of the most outrageous frauds in the Catholic Church. He actually fascinates me - in a sad way. Read on ... Charlie Johnston is a false prophet. His archbishop has "strongly" advised Catholics to be cautious of him.  His archbishop has also banned him from speaking in his own archdiocese. Charlie, in the great tradition of false prophets, has spun this warning to his own advantage , and Charlie's True Believers have rallied around him and have been guzzling the Kool-Aid since the bishop's letter and Charlie's spin appeared earlier this week. I posted about Charlie Johnston last fall , detailing at least one of his prophecies that have proven false, and detailing, from evidence on his Faceb...
13 comments
Read more

Charlie Johnston Lies about Me - and I Admire Him for It!

By
Charlie Johnston is from Belleville. If you come from St. Louis, that's all you need to know. Charlie is the kind of guy you'd meet in a bar in Belleville, Illinois - a working class community across the river from St. Louis, where I'm from.  Guys from Belleville - and from all over Southern Illinois - are characters.  They come up with tall tales and you sit on a bar stool listening to them and you take everything they say with a grain of salt because they're from Belleville. Charlie Johnston is a liar.  Or a teller of tall tales.  Take your pick. He says an angel is giving him secret messages.  He says, among other things, that the last normal Christmas was Christmas of 2013, and if you didn't notice how abnormal Christmas of 2014 and Christmas of 2015 were, that's not his fault.  He says that his angel has told him that Obama will not finish his term; that he will convert and that the 2016 elections will be suspended.  He says that the V...
12 comments
Read more